Standardised series
Score trend
The series shown is the one recalculated in the 2025 edition; a later edition may revise earlier years.
1 is the best rank
Global ranking trend
Ranks before 2025 are derived by ordering the standardised series when the annex does not publish the historical ranking.
Traceability
Series included in this edition
| Observed year | Score | Global rank | Rank type |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | -57 | 352nd | Published |
| 2024 | -58 | 347th | Derived by EED |
| 2023 | 15 | 149th | Derived by EED |
| 2022 | 16 | 114th | Derived by EED |
| 2021 | 28 | 112th | Derived by EED |
| 2020 | 58 | 92nd | Derived by EED |
Global ranking 2025
The nearest ports in the ranking
| World | Port | Score | Δ score | Δ rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 348th | OaklandUnited States | -49.2 | +37.8 | +7 places |
| 349th | SepetibaBrazil | -53.9 | +119.1 | +28 places |
| 350th | ManilaPhilippines | -54 | -20 | -31 places |
| 351st | Port BotanyAustralia | -56 | -8 | -13 places |
| 352nd |
Beyond the CPPI
This port in EED’s tools
The figure needs context
Arrival patterns, weather, draught or tidal restrictions, fleet mix, call size, route disruptions, geopolitical crises and global congestion can all affect the result. The CPPI is an operational benchmark; on its own it does not attribute causes or responsibilities.
Indicators · EED Data